Head to head
Drive Charge Eat or Tesla: where they actually differ
Two products with different jobs. Drive Charge Eat is a dedicated route planner — its job is deciding where you stop and for how long; Tesla in-car navigation is the vehicle's own navigation, which is why it can do things no app can.
Where they differ
| Capability | Drive Charge Eat (our own app) | Tesla |
|---|---|---|
| Models the charging curve | – Unverified | ● Yes |
| Adjusts for weather and temperature | ● Yes | – Unverified |
| Accounts for elevation | ● Yes | – Unverified |
| Live charger availability | ◐ Partly | ● Yes |
| Reads the car | – Unverified | ● Yes |
| Preconditions the battery | – Unverified | ● Yes |
| CarPlay or Android Auto | ◐ Partly | ○ No |
| Pays for the charge | ○ No | ◐ Partly |
| Food, restrooms and facilities | ● Yes | ◐ Partly |
| Driver check-ins and reviews | – Unverified | ○ No |
| Usable without paying | ○ No | ● Yes |
Where they agree
On the remaining 3 capabilities these two are recorded the same way. Rows where both are unverified are agreement about our own ignorance rather than about the products.
Which to choose
Choose Drive Charge Eat if you need cold-weather range modelling, routing that knows the road climbs and food and facilities where you stop. Choose Tesla in-car navigation if you need charging-time estimates that hold up, live charger status, a live connection to the car, battery preconditioning before a rapid charge and something that costs nothing. Price and platform decide the rest, and both are in the table on each product’s own page.
Or both
Most people end up with two of these — a router and either a payment card or the car’s own navigation for the last leg, which is the only thing that reliably preconditions the battery. Using one tool for everything is a preference, not a requirement.