Head to head

Drive Charge Eat or Tesla: where they actually differ

Two products with different jobs. Drive Charge Eat is a dedicated route planner — its job is deciding where you stop and for how long; Tesla in-car navigation is the vehicle's own navigation, which is why it can do things no app can.

Updated 2 min read

View along a motorway from an overbridge towards an exit slip road
Dietmar Rabich · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons

Where they differ

CapabilityDrive Charge Eat (our own app)Tesla
Models the charging curve– Unverified● Yes
Adjusts for weather and temperature● Yes– Unverified
Accounts for elevation● Yes– Unverified
Live charger availability◐ Partly● Yes
Reads the car– Unverified● Yes
Preconditions the battery– Unverified● Yes
CarPlay or Android Auto◐ Partly○ No
Pays for the charge○ No◐ Partly
Food, restrooms and facilities● Yes◐ Partly
Driver check-ins and reviews– Unverified○ No
Usable without paying○ No● Yes

Where they agree

On the remaining 3 capabilities these two are recorded the same way. Rows where both are unverified are agreement about our own ignorance rather than about the products.

Which to choose

Choose Drive Charge Eat if you need cold-weather range modelling, routing that knows the road climbs and food and facilities where you stop. Choose Tesla in-car navigation if you need charging-time estimates that hold up, live charger status, a live connection to the car, battery preconditioning before a rapid charge and something that costs nothing. Price and platform decide the rest, and both are in the table on each product’s own page.

Or both

Most people end up with two of these — a router and either a payment card or the car’s own navigation for the last leg, which is the only thing that reliably preconditions the battery. Using one tool for everything is a preference, not a requirement.