Head to head

Chargemap or Tesla: where they actually differ

Two products with different jobs. Chargemap is a roaming and payment product — its job is one account across many networks; Tesla in-car navigation is the vehicle's own navigation, which is why it can do things no app can.

Updated 2 min read

Electric hatchback photographed from the front three-quarter angle on a street
Alexander Migl · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons

Where they differ

CapabilityChargemapTesla
Plans a charging route◐ Partly● Yes
Models the charging curve– Unverified● Yes
Live charger availability◐ Partly● Yes
Reads the car– Unverified● Yes
Preconditions the battery○ No● Yes
Turn-by-turn navigation– Unverified● Yes
CarPlay or Android Auto– Unverified○ No
Pays for the charge● Yes◐ Partly
Compares session prices◐ Partly○ No
Food, restrooms and facilities– Unverified◐ Partly
Driver check-ins and reviews● Yes○ No

Where they agree

On the remaining 3 capabilities these two are recorded the same way. Rows where both are unverified are agreement about our own ignorance rather than about the products.

Which to choose

Choose Chargemap if you need to start and pay for charging in the app and driver check-ins from the last people there. Choose Tesla in-car navigation if you need a planned charging route rather than a map of chargers, charging-time estimates that hold up, live charger status, a live connection to the car, battery preconditioning before a rapid charge and turn-by-turn navigation rather than a hand-off. Price and platform decide the rest, and both are in the table on each product’s own page.

Or both

Most people end up with two of these — a router and either a payment card or the car’s own navigation for the last leg, which is the only thing that reliably preconditions the battery. Using one tool for everything is a preference, not a requirement.